Systems and methods for transferring stylistic expression in machine translation of sequence data

ABSTRACT

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a system, methods, and computer-readable media for facilitating stylistic expression transfers in machine translation of source sequence data. Using integrated loss functions for style transfer along with content preservation and/or cross entropy, source sequence data is processed by an autoencoder trained to reduce loss values across the loss functions at each time step encoded for the source sequence data. The target sequence data generated by the autoencoder therefore exhibits reduced loss values for the integrated loss functions at each time step, thereby improving content preservation and providing for stylistic expression transfer.

BACKGROUND

Generally, machine translation refers to a hardware, software, or acombination thereof that is configured to perform the specific task oftranslating text or speech from one language to another language. Forexample, machine translation operates to substitute one or more words oftext or speech in one language with one or more words from a secondarylanguage, in attempting to translate the text or speech into thesecondary language. An encoder-decoder model is a mapping model that maybe used to accomplish the machine translation. In machine translation,the encoder-decoder model first uses an encoder to encode the sourcesequence data (e.g., a sentence in one language) into a representationand then uses a decoder to decode the representation into targetsequence dates (e.g., the sentence as translated into another language).However, performance of machine translation via the encoder-decodermodel is limited. For example, current machine translation may notmaintain the meaning of the text or speech itself after translationbecause a word-for-word substitution often does not account for context,phrases, idioms, and differences in the linguistic structure of asentence.

Current machine learning technologies may define or train anencoder-decoder model to identify and predict specific patterns whenperforming translation of text or speech using complex computerprogramming and algorithms. However, current machine learningtechnologies do not define or train an encoder-decoder model to accountfor stylistic expressions when performing translation of text or speech.Accordingly, the inability to account for stylistic expression duringmachine translation is just one of the technological shortcomings ortechnological problems found in current machine learning technologies.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention relate to techniques for stylisticexpression transfer of sequence data. In brief and at a high level,various embodiments of the present invention provide a system, methods,and computer-readable media for facilitating stylistic expressiontransfers between different style corpora in machine translation ofsource sequence data via an autoencoder. Using embodiments herein,source sequence data may be transferred from one expression style (e.g.,corresponding to a high excitement tone) to another different expressionstyle (e.g., corresponding to a non-exciting tone) via machinetranslation by an autoencoder, while the content of the source sequencedata is preserved in the target sequence data that is output. In anotherexample, source sequence data may be transferred from one expressionstyle level (e.g., a corresponding high excitement level) to anotherdifferent expression style level (e.g., a corresponding moderateexcitement level) via machine translation by the autoencoder. The styletransfer is achieved using integrated loss functions for style transfer,content preservation, and/or cross entropy. The autoencoder uses theseloss functions when processing the source sequence data, wherein theautoencoder is machine trained to reduce those loss values across eachof the integrated loss functions, at each time step encoded for thesource sequence data. Using the integrated loss functions to reduce lossduring machine translation, the autoencoder generates target sequencedata that exhibits reduced loss values for the integrated loss functionsat each time step, thereby providing for stylistic expression transfer,while maintaining content preservation. Through the embodiments herein,source content of any style and/or of inconsistent styles can betransferred to another stylistic expression in order to ensure that alltarget sequence data is consistent with a desired style or stylisticexpression level.

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in asimplified form that are further described below in the DetailedDescription. This Summary is not intended to identify key features oressential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended tobe used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subjectmatter. The present invention is defined by the claims as supported bythe Specification, including the Detailed Description and Drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are described in detail below with reference to the attacheddrawing figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example operating environment for implementingembodiments in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a style transfer framework in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a system for the style transfer framework inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a method for style transfer in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates another method for style transfer in accordance withan embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an example computing environment suitablefor use in implementing some embodiments of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The subject matter of the present invention is being described withspecificity herein to meet statutory requirements. However, thedescription itself is not intended to limit the scope of this patent.Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject mattermight also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps orcombinations of steps similar to the ones described in this document, inconjunction with other present or future technologies. Moreover,although the terms “step,” “instance,” and/or “block” may be used hereinto connote different elements of methods employed, the terms should notbe interpreted as implying any particular order among or between varioussteps herein disclosed unless and except when the order of individualsteps is explicitly described. The present disclosure will now bedescribed more fully herein with reference to the accompanying drawings,which may not be drawn to scale and which are not to be construed aslimiting. Indeed, the present invention may be embodied in manydifferent forms and should not be construed as limited to theembodiments set forth herein.

Definitions

Various terms and phrases are used herein to describe embodiments of thepresent invention. Some of the terms and phrases used herein aredescribed here, but more details are included throughout thedescription.

As used herein, “machine translation” refers to fully automated softwarethat can translate source content with one expression into targetcontent with another expression.

As used herein, “style transfer framework” refers to an encoder-decodermodel within a neural network that is specifically configured to performmachine translation.

As used herein, “encoder-decoder model” refers to a sequence to sequence(i.e., “seq2seq”) model in the context of machine translation. Examplesof encoder-decoder models include an autoencoder, a neural network, anda recurrent neural network.

As used herein, “electronic sequence data” refers to data that encodescontent such as text or speech, and further encodes sequentialinformation for that content.

As used herein, “source sequence data” refers to input data that encodesa sentence of text or speech in any language and/or stylisticexpression, and of any variable length of words or characters.

As used herein, “target sequence data” refers to output data from anencoder-decoder model, the output data encoding a sentence of text orspeech in any language and/or stylistic expression, and of any variablelength of words or characters. The target sequence data encodes asentence that has been translated from the source sequence data encodingthe sentence in one language into another language by the encoder-model,in an embodiment. Additionally or alternatively, the target sequencedata encodes a sentence that has been translated from the sourcesequence data encoding the sentence in one stylistic expression intoanother stylistic expression by the encoder-model. The target sequencedata may have a different number of words or characters than the sourcesequence data, in embodiments. In another embodiment, the targetsequence data may have the same number of word or characters as thesource sequence data.

As used herein, “style” and “stylistic expression” are usedinterchangeably to refer to one or more dominant trait(s) that describethe language usage of a corpora, a sentence, a word, or the like.Examples of styles include excitement, formal, sincere, inspirational,trendy, sarcasm, humor, and juvenile. As such, styles may be associatedwith hyperbole, a lack of hyperbole, adjectives, a lack of adjectives,sentence structure, and/or specific punctuation marks, such as a period(.) or exclamation point (!). In embodiments, the style is used todescribe the language usage within a sentence, for example, where thetraits of the language usage create a particular “feel” for the sentenceand may further provide emotional context for the meaning of thesentence.

As used herein, “style level” refers to a rating or a strength by whichtext or speech exhibits the one or more dominant trait(s) of aparticular style. As such, one or more style levels within a particularstyle may be used in the stylistic transfer discussed herein to producetarget sequence data having a specific degree of, for example, anexcitement style. Style levels may be pre-defined by the structuredlanguage within a corpora for a particular style, in embodiments.

As used herein, “corpora” refers to one or more corpus used for languagetranslation. A “corpus” refers to a body of a plurality of structuredtext or speech. The term “parallel corpora” refers to two or morecorpora that have texts in two different languages or stylisticexpressions that can be linguistically mapped to one another for thepurpose of translation. The term “non-parallel corpora” refers to two ormore corpora that have texts in two or more different languages orstylistic expressions which do not map to one another, or otherwisewhich are difficult to map to one another based on linguisticdifferences.

As used here, an “entity” refers to an individual having a personalityprofile and/or associated style. Examples of an entity include anindividual person, a retailer, a wholesaler, a non-business entity, asocial media entity, a blogger, a website, a brick-and-mortar entity, afranchise, an internet-based entity, or the like.

As used herein, “personality” and “personality profile” are usedinterchangeably to refer to one or more styles that, either alone ortogether, produce a unique and recognizable identity that correspond toa particular entity, based on the consistent association of the one ormore styles with content, communications, and presence of thatparticular entity. For example, the language used for content providedby or on behalf of entity A in internet, application, and/or socialmedia communications and presentation may be distinct from otherentities, and/or may be related to the business subject matter of entityA. In this way, the style or stylistic expression of the language usedfor the content, communications, and presence of that particular entityis distinct to the entity. In an example, the personality profile ofentity A may be recognizable by a user, a computing device, and/orartificial intelligence, such that entity A is distinguishable from thepersonality profile of entity B, when entity A and entity B are not thesame entity, albeit entity A or entity B might be a sub-entity of theother. In another example, electronic or internet-based trade dress ofan entity may comprise the one or more styles of the personalityprofile.

As used herein, “embedding space” refers to a low-dimensional space orlayer into which high-dimensional vectors may be translated, in thecontext of machine translation. In embodiments, source sequence data isembedded into the embedding space using time steps to represent words inthe sentence encoded by the source sequence data. As such, by mappingthe source sequence data to the embedding space, the source sequencedata may be represented as a plurality of time steps having a specificsequential order relative to one another, generally.

As used herein, “time step” corresponds to a word identified in thesentence encoded in the source sequence data. In an embodiment, arecurrent neural network obtains two inputs at each time step, thoseinputs being an input from source sequence data and a hidden state.

As used herein, “hidden state” refers to the sequential information thatis preserved for the time steps preceding the current time step at ahidden layer. For example, a hidden state for time step t₂ includes thesequential information of prior time steps t₁ and t₀. In this way, arecurrent neural network using an encoder-decoder model is able toutilize the hidden state to “learn” from all of the prior time stepswhen the last sequential hidden state is passed from an encoder to adecoder, for example. In one embodiment, only the last hidden statecorresponding to the last time step may be passed from the encoder to adecoder. In another embodiment, all of the hidden states of all of thetime steps may be passed from the encoder to a decoder.

As used herein, “latent space” refers to a bottleneck layer within theencoder-decoder model, wherein a compressed representation of the sourcesequence data is generated. In embodiments, time steps and hidden statescorresponding to those time steps are encoded into the latent space. Inone such example, the latent space holds a compressed representation ofthe sentence encoded in the source sequence data, where that compressedrepresentation is created from each of the time steps and each of thehidden states associated with each time step.

As used herein, a “vector” is an array of numerical values representingthe source sequence data, wherein there is a numerical value for eachtime step. The terms “vector” and “context vector” may be usedinterchangeably to refer to compressed representation of the sentenceencoded in the source sequence data. An “attention context vector”refers an array of numerical values representing the source sequencedata, wherein there is a numerical value for each time step, and eachnumerical values is associated with a weighting value based on attentionto particular hidden states at specific time steps.

As used herein, “attention weights” are a weighting value that isattached to each numerical value in the vector representing the timesteps and hidden states. In one embodiment, the attention weights arepredefined values used to maximize or minimize the score of each hiddenstate, such that hidden states with relatively high scores are magnifiedin the machine translation and hidden states with relatively low scoresare minimized and “drowned out” during the machine translation. In someembodiments, attention weights are a component used by an attentionmechanism in the context of machine translation.

As used herein, “cross entropy loss value” refers to a value calculatedby the following formula:

$L_{ml} = {- {\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{m}{\log{p( {P_{t}( y_{t}^{*} )} )}}}}$

As used herein, “style transfer strength” refers to a measure or adegree by which the output text belongs to the target or selected style.The style transfer strength may be quantified by the style transfer lossvalue.

As used herein, “style transfer loss value” refers to a value calculatedusing one or more of the following formulas. In an embodiment, the styletransfer loss function may be expressed using two formulas. The firstformula produces a style transfer loss value for embodiments may bedefined as, for those situations when source sequence data is beingtransferred from a first higher level of a particular style into targetsequence data having a second relatively low level of the particularstyle:L _(ts)=−log(1−s(y′))

The second formula produces a style transfer loss value for embodimentswhen source sequence data is being transferred from a first low level ofa particular style into target sequence data having a second relativelyhigher level of the particular style:L _(ts)=−log(s(y′))

As used herein, “content preservation” refers to a measure or a degreeby which the output text retains the core truth or facts of the inputtext. In simpler terms, content preservation may be considered ameasurement of how well the output text has retained the same meaning asthe original input text, independent of any style.

As used herein, “content preservation loss value” refers to a valuecalculated by the following formula:

$L_{cp} = {( {{r( y^{\prime} )} - {r( y^{s} )}} ){\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{m}{\log{p( {{y_{t}^{s}❘{y_{1}^{s}\mspace{20mu}\ldots\mspace{14mu}\ldots\mspace{20mu} y_{t - 1}^{s}}},x} )}}}}$

As used herein, a “word” refers one or more words. In some embodiments,a word may comprise a single word. In another embodiment, a word maycomprise a multi-word phrase (i.e., an n-gram).

Overview

Current encoder-decoder models for performing machine translation areunable to account for stylistic expressions of language when translatingtext or language from one language to another language. As such, whentranslating a sentence from one language to another language, currentencoder-decoder models are not capable of changing the stylisticexpression of the source sequence data into a different stylisticexpression for the target sequence data that is output. This is atechnological shortcoming or technological problem specific to machinetranslation. Current encoder-decoder models are limited, at best, todetermining the factual meaning of a sentence, for example, without anyregard to stylistic expressions.

Embodiments of the current invention provide a technological solution tothe technological shortcomings discussed above. In embodiments, a styletransfer framework applies integrated loss functions to define and trainan encoder-decoder model to account for and change the stylisticexpression of text or speech when preforming a machine translation. Bydefining and training an encoder-decoder model to account for and changethe stylistic expression of text or speech when preforming a machinetranslation, the style transfer framework overcomes the limitations ofcurrent machine translation technologies. In this way, the styletransfer framework produces an encoder-decoder model having a newtechnological function, i.e., stylistic expression transfer.

In order to achieve personality or style consistency and conformityacross multiple electronic and/or internet-based content, a styletransfer framework is described herein that uses an integrated lossfunction to translate source sequence data exhibiting one expressionstyle into target sequence data having another, different expressionstyle. For example, a sentence having a first “formal personality” styleis input and used to generate a new sentence as output, where the newoutput sentence exhibits the traits of a second “casual personality”style. As such, using the style transfer framework, source sequence dataof any style may be modified into a selected style associated with anentity's brand or personality profile. In this way, for example,consistency and conformity with the entity's personality profile isgenerated across varied content, communications, or presence of anentity, independent of the original source or author of the originalcontent or sequence data. The entity is therefore able to create contentand keep that content consistent with the brand across any number ofwebsites, promotions, emails, or the like.

Additionally or alternatively, the source sequence data belonging to orcorresponding with a first level of a first style may be used togenerate and output sequence data having a second level of the samefirst style. In one such example, a sentence may be changed from a firstlevel (e.g., a lowest level) of an “excitement” style to a second,higher level (e.g., moderate level) of the excitement style.Accordingly, the style transfer framework may be implemented to modifysource sequence data of a selected style into a different level of theselected style associated with the personality profile, thus furtherproviding consistency and conformity with the personality profile acrossvaried content, communications, or presence of an entity, independent ofthe original source or author of the content or sequence data.

The style transfer framework overcomes the limitations of othertechnologies by using reinforcement-learning to train (i.e., reward) theattention-based encoder-decoder model for computerized machinetranslation to produce target sequence data having reduced or lowoverall values as determined by an integrated “overall” loss function.In embodiments, the integrated loss function corresponds to an overallloss function referred to as “Loss.” The overall loss functionintegrates a loss function for determining loss values for styletransfer strength and a loss function for content preservation, in someembodiments. The overall loss function Loss provides the reinforcementlearning aspect that trains the attention-based encoder-decoder model toperform a style transfer and improve content preservation during machinetranslation via the style transfer framework. Accordingly, in someembodiments, the integrated loss function is used to reward theattention-based encoder-decoder model when it outputs target sequencedata having reduced or low style transfer loss values and reduced or lowcontent preservation loss values.

In embodiments, source sequence data corresponding to a source corpus isinput to an encoder component in a recurrent neural network. The encodercomponent processes the source sequence data to generate a time step foreach word in the sentence encoded in the source sequence data, as wellas a hidden state for each word in the sentence encoded in the sourcesequence data, in embodiments. In an embodiment, the encoder componentthen processes the time steps and hidden states in sequential orderusing attention weights in order to generate a compressed representationof the source sequence data. The compressed representation (e.g., avector) is passed to a decoder component in the recurrent neuralnetwork, in embodiments.

For each time step, and using the hidden states for each time step, thedecoder component applies the integrated “overall” Loss function totrain the encoder-decoder model to select a word, in variousembodiments. In some embodiments, the decoder component selects a wordfrom the target corpus having a reduced or minimized overall loss valueas determined by the Loss function, at a time step. As the Loss functionintegrates a loss function for style transfer strength, the selection ofa word having a reduced or minimized overall loss value as determined bythe Loss function at that time step, relative to the overall loss valuesdetermined for other candidate words at that time step, is a selectionthat include a reduced or minimized style transfer loss value determinedby the loss function integrated into the Loss function. As the decodercomponent determines loss values for each time step, and further basedon at least one hidden state of the source sequence data, the decodercomponent generates target sequence data as output. The target sequencedata includes the word(s) selected from the target corpus.

Using this style transfer framework, an entity is able to producecontent having a style that is consistent with the entity's personalityand/or brand using the style transfer framework to change input text, inany style and by any author, into output text of a particular desiredstyle. The style transfer framework uses reinforcement-learning and anattention-based encoder-decoder model to perform style transfer viamachine translation. The style transfer framework discussed hereinperforms transfers between various text styles and/or levels of textstyles, in addition to improving the levels of content preservationduring machine translation.

At a practical level, an entity desires to maintain style that isconsistent with an entity's personality or brand across multiple anddiverse forms of electronic content and/or the entity's electronicpresence. For example, Company A desires that all text content used onits website, emails, social media accounts, advertisements, promotions,entity-specific mobile applications, entity-specific push notifications,and the like is consistent in “personality” or style, such that all ofthe text content is recognizable as associated with or is attributed toCompany A. The personality or style may be used to distinguish Company Afrom Company B, for example. In a further example, Company A may desirethat all text content on its website, emails, social media accounts, andthe like is consistent with a personality profile of the Company A,where that personality profile comprises one or more styles, such thatall of the text content is recognizable as associated with or attributedto Company A.

Example Style Transfer Systems

Beginning with FIG. 1, a schematic depiction is provided illustrating anexample system 100 in which some embodiments of the present inventionmay be employed. It should be understood from this Description that thisand other arrangements described herein are set forth only as examples.Other arrangements and elements (e.g., machines, interfaces, functions,orders, groupings of functions, etc.) may be used in addition to orinstead of those shown, and some elements may be omitted altogether.Further, many of the elements described herein are functional entitiesthat may be implemented as discrete or distributed components or inconjunction with other components, and in any suitable combination andlocation. Various functions described herein as being performed by oneor more entities may be carried out by hardware, firmware, and/orsoftware. For instance, various functions may be carried out by aprocessor executing instructions stored in memory. Although FIG. 1 showsa networked solution with the style system framework on a computingdevice or server that is separate from the client device, in variousembodiments some or all of the functionality of the style systemframework can be provided on the client device.

The system 100 in FIG. 1 includes a neural network host 102 (e.g., oneor more servers and/or one or more other computing devices). In someinstances, the neural network host 102 may be accessed, directly orindirectly, over a direct connection or an indirect connection, such asnetwork 104 (e.g., a LAN or the Internet). In one example, the neuralnetwork host 102 may send and/or receive transmissions to and/or from aclient device 106 (e.g., a terminal). It is contemplated, however, thatany configuration for accessing and/or managing the neural network host102 may be employed. For instance, the neural network host 102 may beaccessed and/or managed directly or indirectly through one or morenetwork connections. Moreover, a database (not shown), or any othermemory device or storage component, may also be included in the system100 to facilitate storage and/or retrieval of data (e.g., electronicsequence data) by any one of the illustrated components.

The neural network host 102 may include a set of neural networks that istrained, or may be trained, based on embodiments of the presentinvention discussed herein. The trained set of neural networks maygenerate target sequence data as further described herein. As noted, insome embodiments, the neural network of the neural network host 102 maycomprise a style transfer framework.

Turning to FIG. 2, a style transfer framework 200 is illustrated inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Additionally,FIG. 3 illustrates a system 300 comprising the style transfer framework200, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. It iscontemplated that any component depicted in FIGS. 2 and 3 is not limitedto the illustrated embodiment, however, and may be distributed among aplurality of components or computing devices, or in some instances, maybe conflated into a single component or module, such as a processor orother hardware device. It is also contemplated that any one or more ofthe described components may be completely removed from the styletransfer framework 200, so long as one or more operations describedcorresponding to a removed component may be compensated for by one ormore other components, or a third-party resource, remote computingdevice, or hardware device, among other things.

The style transfer framework 200 comprises an encoder-decoder model, inembodiments. The encoder-decoder model comprises an encoder component202 and a decoder component 204, in some embodiments. In an embodiment,the encoder-decoder model is a “seq2seq” based model. In someembodiments, the encoder-decoder model is an autoencoder neural network.In one embodiment, the encoder-decoder model comprises a long short-termmemory (LSTM) autoencoder, where the LSTM autoencoder is aself-supervised model that operates in order to learn a compressedrepresentation of input data. For example, the LSTM autoencoder maylearn the compressed representation for sequence data. Examples ofsequence data includes text, video, audio, and time series data. Forsimplicity, a sentence comprising text is discussed herein as an exampleof sequence data. As such, “sequence data” and “sentence” may bereferred to interchangeably, for the purposes of clarity and ease ofexplanation in this Detailed Description, though it will be understoodthat embodiments of the invention are not limited to text or aparticular type of sequence data.

Source sequence data 206 that comprises a sentence is received by thestyle transfer framework 200, in embodiments. In one embodiment, theencoder component 202 of the style transfer framework 200 may receivethe source sequence data 206, where that source sequence data 206encodes a sentence of one or more words belonging to a first corpus of aparticular style. For simplicity, this sentence is interchangeablyreferred to as initial sentence, original sentence, first sentence,and/or source sentence, to indicate that the particular sentence asencoded into the source sequence data 206 serves as input to the styletransfer framework 200 or its components, prior to a style transfer.Generally, words in the source sequence data 206 are identified by thestyle transfer framework 200. In some embodiments, the encoder component202 may identify each individual word within the source sequence data206. The encoder component 202 of the encoder-decoder model may map thesource sequence data 206 to an embedding space 208, in an embodiment. Itwill be understood that the embedding space 208 may be a layer withinthe style transfer framework 200, in some embodiments.

In some embodiments, the encoder component 202 may encode the sourcesequence data 206 as one or more “time steps,” the one or more timesteps corresponding to the one or more words of the source sequence data206. In FIG. 2, each time step is represented as a rectangular box(e.g., time step to 203, shown in an example bidirectional LSTM layer).In a further embodiment, the encoder component 202 comprises a time stepmapping component 210, which may map the source sequence data 206 to theembedding space 208 within the encoder-decoder model. For example, thetime step mapping component 210 of the encoder component 202 may beconfigured to, via one or more processors, map each of the identifiedwords in the source sequence data 206 to the embedding space 208.Accordingly, in various embodiments, each of the identified words in thesource sequence data 206 is mapped to the embedding space 208 as acorresponding time step via the encoder component 202 and/or the timestep mapping component 210 thereof.

Generally, the embedding space 208 is a low-dimensional space into whichthe source sequence data 206 may be translated into high-dimensionalvectors. Within the embedding space 208, sematic relations of the sourcesequence data 206 and the identified words may be encoded by the encodercomponent 202 and/or the time step mapping component 210 thereof, inembodiments. When mapping the source sequence data 206 into theembedding space 208, each identified word may be determined tocorrespond to a separate time step, in some embodiments. The time stepsrepresent the individual identified words, in embodiments. Additionally,the sequence of the time steps represents the sequence of how the wordsappear relative to one another within the source sequence data 206, inan embodiment. For example, the very first word appearing in the sourcesequence data 206 may be mapped as time step to (i.e., t=0), while thesecond word in the source sequence data 206 that immediately follows thefirst word may be mapped as time step t₁ (i.e., t=1), and so on, for anyvariable number of words that form the source sequence data 206. Bymapping the source sequence data 206 to the embedding space, the sourcesequence data 206 may be represented as a plurality of time steps havinga specific sequential order relative to one another, generally. Thesequential order of the time steps corresponds to and represents thesequential order of the words as they appeared in the source sequencedata 206, in various embodiments. Generally, by encoding each word ofthe source sequence data 206 into discrete or individual time steps, theencoder component 202 is able to produce a fixed-size representation ofthe source sequence data 206, in an embodiment. In one embodiment, thefixed-size representation represents the source sequence data 206 ashaving a specified sequence of words and a length of the source sequencedata 206. For example, a source sequence data 206 may be expressed orrepresented as X=x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ . . . xl, where l is the length of thesource sequence data 206, and x_(n) refers to the words or time stepsidentified therein.

Punctuation may also be identified and determined to be an individualtime step when the encoder component 202 and/or the time step mappingcomponent 210 thereof maps the source sequence data 206 to the embeddingspace 208, in some embodiments. In particular, punctuation that relatesto stylistic expression may be encoded and considered. For example,punctuation such as an exclamation point (“!”) provides stylisticexpression information that is useable in the style transfer, discussedherein.

Subsequent to mapping the source sequence data 206 to the embeddingspace 208 to generate representative time steps, the time steps areencoded into a latent space 212 by the encoder component 202. In someembodiments, the latent space 212 refers to a bottleneck layer withinthe encoder-decoder model, wherein a compressed representation of thesource sequence data 206 is generated. The compressed representationcomprises those elements or features of the source sequence data 206that the encoder component 202 has determined to be the most relevantfor carrying to the decoder component 204. The most relevant elements orfeatures may refer to, for example, words corresponding to the sentimentof the source sequence data 206. Accordingly, the words having thehighest relevancy to maintaining the content or meaning conveyed by thesource sequence data 206 are selected and carried into the compressedrepresentation within the latent space. In some embodiments, theencoder-decoder comprises an autoencoder neural network such that thecompressed representation of the source sequence data 206 is arepresentation that has the fewest number of neurons.

Generally, sequence data determined to have a similar meaning is/aremapped closer to one another within the latent space 212 when generatingthe compressed representation of the sequence data. As such, in someembodiments, words (i.e., represented as time steps) having similarsemantic meanings may be mapped closer to one another in the latentspace 212. Additionally, words (i.e., represented as time steps) havingdifferent semantic meanings may be mapped apart from one another in thelatent space. As used herein, the degree proximity reflects the overlapor lack of overlap between the semantic meanings of the words, and thelatent space 212 compressed representation may be visualized as acluster map, for example. As such, the time steps are encoded to producean intermediate mapping stage of the sequence data or sentence, referredto as an encoder state or a “hidden” state, in embodiments. In anembodiment, each time step is associated with one or more hiddenstate(s) for that time step. At a high level, the term “hidden”references a hidden layer of the encoder-decoder model, such as thelatent space 212, which is a hidden vector space.

As such, is some embodiments, the time steps are encoded and/or mappedinto a latent space 212 by the encoder component 202, which encodesand/or maps one or more of the hidden states for each of the time stepsinto the latent space 212. In further embodiments, all hidden states fora time step are encoded into the latent space 212 for the time step. Inan embodiment, the encoder component 202 comprises a hidden stateencoding component 214 for this purpose. In one such embodiment, thehidden state encoding component 214 is configured to, via one or moreprocessors, map time steps into a latent space 212. In furtherembodiments, the hidden state encoding component 214 is configured tomap all hidden states for a time step into the latent space 212 for thetime step. For example, element 216 represents a recurrent state of timestep t₃.

In FIG. 2, the style transfer framework 200 may include an attentioncomponent 218. In embodiments, the attention component 218 acts toaugment or enhance the performance of the encoder-decoder model. Basedon the encoder component 202 encoding the source sequence data 206 intothe embedding space 208 as time steps, and further encoding one or moreof the hidden states for each of the time steps into the latent space212, the attention component 218 determines attention weights for eachof the one or more hidden states (e.g., each time step representing eachword in the source sequence data 206), in some embodiments. Theattention weights are used to generate an attention context vector 220,in embodiments. Accordingly, the attention context vector 220 isgenerated based on the attention component 218 determining content-basedattention weights for each hidden state, at each time step, inembodiments. In some embodiments, each hidden state from the encodercomponent 202 is scored and normalized by the attention component 218 inorder to determine a hidden state probability over all the hidden statesof the encoder component 202. Using these hidden state probabilities, aweighted sum is determined and used by the attention component 218 togenerate the attention context vector 220, in some embodiments. Thehidden state of the terminal time step for the source sequence data 206(e.g., corresponds to the last word in the sentence or the finalpunctuation of the sentence) may be used, in some embodiments, toinitialize the decoder component 204.

In embodiments, the attention context vector 220 is provided to thedecoder component 204 of the encoder-decoder model. The decodercomponent 204 uses the attention context vector 220 in order to generatetarget sequence data 222 that encodes a target sentence. As used herein,the terms “new sentence,” “target sentence,” “output sentence,” and/or“second sentence” are used interchangeably to refer to the targetsequence data that is generated by the decoder component 204 in thetransfer of the sequence data. In some embodiments, the decodercomponent 204 generates target sequence data 222 that encodes a targetsentence, such that the target sequence data 222 includes the word(s)selected for each of the one or more time steps based on the decoding.In embodiments, the target sequence data 222 is different from thesource sequence data 206, specifically because the target sequence data222 is the transferred (e.g., transferred from one style corpora toanother style corpora) output from the encoder-decoder model, based onthe source sequence data 206. In some embodiments, the target sequencedata 222 exhibits a different stylistic expression than the sourcesequence data 206. As further explained herein, the target sequence data222 produced via the embodiments herein maintains the content of thesource sequence data 206, yet exhibits a style transfer relative to thesource sequence data 206 having words from the source corpus of onestyle. The target sequence data 222 has been adjusted or is otherwisedifferent from the stylistic expression of the source sequence data 206based on the style transfer performed, in embodiments.

In the embodiment of FIGS. 2 and 3, the decoder component 204 comprisesa recurrent neural network component 224 (“RNN”) which facilitates thestyle transfer. Alternatively or additionally, the decoder component 204comprises a convolutional neural network. In performing the styletransfer, the decoder component 204 may predict a probabilitydistribution over a vocabulary at each time step, in an embodiment. Inone embodiment, the recurrent neural network component 224 of thedecoder component 204 may predict a probability distribution over avocabulary for the attention context vector 220 generated from thesource sequence data 206. Generally, the predicted probabilitydistribution may be referred to as “RNN probability distribution” or“vocabulary probability distribution” interchangeably herein. Generally,the vocabulary refers to an entire space of words that the system hasaccess to and “knows,” and the system selects a word for a time stepfrom the space of words as discussed further herein.

In embodiments, the decoder component 204 may predict a probability overthe words for the attention context vector 220 generated from the sourcesequence data 206, based on the attention context vector 220. In oneembodiment, the decoder component 204 may comprise a pointer networkcomponent 226. In such an embodiment, the pointer network component 226may predict a probability over the words for the source sequence data206, based on the attention context vector 220. In one such embodiment,the pointer network component 226 may be configured to, via the one ormore processors, calculate a words probability distribution for each ofthe one or more time steps of the attention context vector 220 generatedfrom the source sequence data 206. Generally, the pointer network modulepredicted probability distribution is referred to as “PTR probabilitydistribution” or “words probability distribution” interchangeablyherein.

In further embodiments, the decoder component 204 comprises therecurrent neural network component 224 and the pointer network component226, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. In one such embodiment, the decodercomponent 204 predicts a vocabulary probability distribution using therecurrent neural network component 224 and predicts a words probabilitydistribution using the pointer network component 226.

Continuing, in order to generate the target sequence data, the decodercomponent 204 may calculate an overall probability distribution for eachtime step encoded in the attention context vector 220, in embodiments.As such, the decoder component 204 selects one or more word(s) (i.e.,for each time step) by decoding each of the one or more time steps,hidden states, and attention weights, as encoded within the attentioncontext vector 220.

The overall probability distribution may be calculated by the decodercomponent 204 for each of the individual time steps. For example, thedecoder component 204 may determine a weighted average using thevocabulary probability distribution δP_(t) ^(RNN)(w) and the wordsprobability distribution (1−δ)P_(t) ^(PTR)(w) The overall probabilitydistribution P_(t)(w) at time step t is then calculated using theweighted average of the vocabulary probability distribution and thewords probability distribution. In some embodiments, the overallprobability distribution may be expressed as:P _(t)(w)=δP _(t) ^(RNN)(w)+(1−δ)P _(t) ^(PTR)(w)

In embodiments, δ represents a weight factor that is used to linearlycombine the vocabulary probability distribution and the wordsprobability distribution at a time step. This weight factor may bepredefined. For example, the weight factor may be computed based onoutputs from the encoder-decoder model's hidden states at a previoustime step.

Using the overall probability distribution calculated at each time stept, the decoder component 204 generates target sequence data 222 byselecting, at each time step, one word having the highest probabilityrelative to a probability of other words at that time step, in someembodiments. The decoder component 204 generates target sequence data222 where the word(s) selected for each time step is the word having thehighest or the greatest overall probability distribution relative toother available or “candidate” words at that same time step, in someembodiments.

In addition to using the overall probability distribution to selectwords to construct the target sequence data 222, the encoder-decodermodel is trained to reduce cross entropy at each time step, inembodiments. In a further embodiment, the encoder-decoder model istrained to minimize cross entropy for each time step. The followingequation may be used to train the encoder-decoder model to reduce and/orminimize cross entropy loss values for each time step, in an embodiment:

$L_{ml} = {- {\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{m}{\log{p( {P_{t}( y_{t}^{*} )} )}}}}$

In the equation directly above, referred to herein as the “crossentropy” loss function or equation, m represents the maximum length forthe target sequence data 222 and y_(t)* represents a ground truth wordat time step t. In embodiments, the cross entropy loss function L_(ml)operates to train the encoder-decoder to reduce loss and/or minimizeloss by incentivizing or providing reinforcement to the encoder-decodermodel. As used herein, “ground truth” refers to a fact or concept in thesource sequence data 206 that, prior to style transfer, is intended topersist into the target sequence data 222 after style transfer, in thecontext of machine learning and/or machine translation arts.

Notably, the cross entropy loss function L_(ml) operates to reward(i.e., reinforcement learning) the encoder-decoder model during trainingwhen the encoder-decoder model selects one or more words that reducesloss in the cross entropy loss function L_(ml) on a word-by-word basis(e.g., at each time step). Rewarding reductions in loss at the wordlevel improves the performance of the encoder-decoder model itself inthe practical application of machine translation of sequence data.Additionally, operating at the word level produces robust reinforcementlearning, in contrast to metrics that operate only on a sentence level.As such, the encoder-decoder model utilizes the overall probabilitydistribution and the cross entropy loss function L_(ml) to select wordsat each time step in order to generate the target sequence data 222encoding a target sentence having words that conform to the style of thetarget corpora. In this fashion, a word having both a highestprobability and a greatest loss reduction may be selected at each timestep, in specific embodiments. In some embodiments, a word having aprobability that meets or exceeds a predefined threshold and a lossreduction that meets or exceeds a predefined threshold may be selectedby the decoder component 204 at each time step. In another embodiment, aword having a greatest probability and a loss reduction that meets orexceeds a predefined threshold may be selected by the decoder component204 at each time step. In yet another embodiment, a word having aprobability that meets or exceeds a predefined threshold and a greatestloss reduction may be selected by the decoder component 204 at each timestep. In various embodiments, the decoder component 204 may select aword at each time step based on a highest probability, a lowest loss, apredefined threshold for probability, a predefined threshold for loss,or a combination thereof to optimize the target sequence data.

In order to further improve the performance of the encoder-decoder modelof the style transfer framework 200 itself in the practical applicationof machine translation of sequence data, an overall loss function Lossis described herein for additional reinforcement training. The overallloss function Loss incorporates the cross entropy loss function L_(ml)discussed directly above along with discriminator-based loss functionsthat incentivize and reward style transfer strength. Additionally, insome embodiments, the overall loss function Loss incorporates a lossfunction that incentivizes and rewards content preservation, as will bedescribed. In some embodiments, the overall loss function Loss may beexpressed as:Loss=αL _(ml) +βL _(cp) +γL _(ts)

The overall loss function Loss improves the performance of theencoder-decoder model itself in the practical application of machinetranslation of sequence data. For example, the overall loss functionLoss improves content preservation in the practical application of themodel for machine translation of sequence data. Further, the overallloss function Loss introduces a new and unconventional technologicalfunction to the encoder-decoder model: stylistic expression transfer,translating a sentence having words from one style corpora into a newsentence having words from a different style corpora, or a differentstyle level. As discussed herein, the decoder component 204 and/or therecurrent neural network component 224 thereof, may be configured to,via the one or more processors, determine an overall loss value for aword at each of the one or more time steps during training, wherein theoverall loss value is determined by the overall loss function Loss,which may be expressed as Loss=αL_(ml)+βL_(cp)+γL_(ts), in someembodiments.

In various embodiments, α, β, and γ are predefined values that can beused to control the performance of the machine translation. For example,by adjusting the values of α, β, and γ relative to one another, theoverall loss function may be adjusted to more weight the contentpreservation function (i.e., modified by β), the transfer strengthfunction (i.e., modified by γ), and/or the cross entropy function (i.e.,modified by α) relative to one another. The values for α, β, and γ maybe predefined and customizable. In one embodiment, a predefined valueγ>a predefined value for α, and the predefined value γ>a predefinedvalue for β, such that the style transfer loss function L_(ts) isweighted more heavily that the cross entropy loss function L_(ml) andthe content preservation loss function L_(cp). In some embodiments, thevalues for α, β, and γ are the same.

Content Preservation

In some embodiments, the overall loss function Loss includes a contentpreservation loss function L_(cp) that rewards and/or incentivizesincreasing the content preservation between the source sequence data 206and the target sequence data 222 generated through the encoder-decodermodel in the style transfer framework, such as the style transferframework 200 illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3. Beginning with the contentpreservation loss function L_(cp), it operates to train theencoder-decoder model to preserve the content of the source sequencedata 206 when generating the target sequence data 222. As used herein,“content preservation” refers to a measure or a degree by which theoutput text retains the original fact (i.e., “core truth”) of the inputtext. In simpler terms, content preservation may be considered ameasurement of how well the target sequence data 222 has retained thesame or similar factual meaning as the source sequence data 206,independent of any style. In some embodiments, the content preservationloss function L_(cp) may be expressed as:

$L_{cp} = {( {{r( y^{\prime} )} - {r( y^{s} )}} ){\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{m}{\log{p( {{y_{t}^{s}❘{y_{1}^{s}\mspace{20mu}\ldots\mspace{14mu}\ldots\mspace{14mu} y_{t - 1}^{s}}},x} )}}}}$

The content preservation loss function L_(cp) shown directly aboverewards and/or incentivizes increasing content preservation of thesource sequence data 206 that is translated into the target sequencedata 222, as generated by the encoder-decoder model. In embodiments,target sequence data for a possible output sentence y^(s) is obtained bysampling from the probability distribution p(y_(t) ^(s)|y₁ ^(s) . . .y_(t−1) ^(s) at each decoding time step. Target sequence data y′ foranother possible output sentence represents a baseline output that isobtained by maximizing the output probability distribution at each timestep, in embodiments. In this example, the output probabilitydistribution is maximized by using a greedy algorithm at each time step.In some embodiments, a greedy algorithm is a paradigm that uses aproblem solving heuristic for making a locally optimal choice at eachtime step with the intent of finding a global optimum. The term r(y) isdefined as the reward function for the target sequence data for each ofthe possible output sentences y^(s) or y′. According to the lossfunction L_(cp), the difference term represents a difference calculatedbetween a reward metric (e.g., Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU)scores) for a sentence sampled using a greedy algorithm, such as outputsentence y′, and a reward metric for a sentence that is sampled in amultinomial manner, Σ_(t=1) ^(m) log p(y_(t) ^(s)|y₁ ^(s) . . . y_(t−1)^(s),x). The output sentence is compared to the ground truth outputusing the reward metric, the reward metric being produced by the rewardfunction r(y). Additionally, in the loss function L_(cp), the variable mrepresents the maximum length of the target sequence data 222, in someembodiments. The log term in the loss function L_(cp) represents a logof likelihood of a word to be a good fit for selection at a particulartime step, based on the sequence of words that is generated prior tothat particular time step, in various embodiments.

In the content preservation loss function L_(cp), the reward functionuses the reward metric to incentivize content preservation. Generally,minimizing L_(cp) encourages or reinforces the encoder-decoder model tolearn to generate target sequence data 222 that has a higher rewardmetric (e.g., BLEU score) relative to the reward metric for the outputsentence y′ that serves as a baseline output. In some embodiments, aBLEU score is used as the reward metric, wherein the BLEU score is ameasure of overlap between target sequence data 222 relative to theground truth. As such, a high BLEU score indicates a high level ofoverlap in content, which indicates that ground truth is maintained andcontent is preserved, for example. In embodiments utilizing BLEUscoring, the score is a numerical value or percentage between 0 and 100,wherein the numerical value of 100 indicates complete overlap (i.e.,identical, 100% overlap). This value indicates a degree of similarity,or how similar the candidate target sequence data is to a referencetext, with values approaching “100” representing increasing similarityof the text and values approaching “0” indicating increasingdissimilarity of the text.

When ground truth is maintained as indicated by similarity and/oroverlap between compared texts, there is a high level of contentpreservation, as opposed to content degradation. In embodiments, thecontent preservation loss function L_(cp) provides a reward for highBLEU scores. By rewarding and thus reinforcing the encoder-decoder modelto produce target sequence data 222 that has high BLEU scores, andbecause high BLEU scores indicate high content overlap, the contentpreservation loss function L_(cp) improves content preservation of theencoder-decoder model in the style transfer framework 200.

Therefore, in various embodiments, the decoder component 204 of theencoder-decoder model may select a word for inclusion in the targetsequence data 222 based on the content preservation loss value (i.e.,calculated using the content preservation loss function L_(cp))calculated for that word being less than a content preservation lossvalue (i.e., calculated using the content preservation loss functionL_(cp)) calculated for all of the other available words that could beselected for that particular time step. In another embodiment, thedecoder component 204 may select the word based on the contentpreservation loss value of that word being less than the contentpreservation loss values determined for a predefined portion of theother available words for the time step. In yet another embodiment, thedecoder component 204 may select the word based on the contentpreservation loss value of that word being less than the contentpreservation loss values determined for a predefined threshold (e.g., apercentage, a mode, a median) of the other available words for the timestep. In this way, the decoder component 204 of the encoder-decodermodel, either during training or having been previously trained, selectsa word at each time step in a manner that preserves the content of thesource sequence data 206 in the target sequence data 222 being assembledor otherwise generated by the decoder component 204, by selecting a wordhaving reduced and/or minimized loss values determined using the contentpreservation loss function L_(cp).

Stylistic Expression Transfer

Returning to the overall loss function Loss, the overall loss functionLoss comprises a style transfer loss function L_(ts) that rewards and/orincentivizes increasing the style transfer strength of the targetsequence data 222 that is generated through the encoder-decoder model inthe style transfer framework 200, in some embodiments. The overall lossfunction Loss provides style transfer strength in addition to theimproved content preservation discussed above, in some embodiments wherethe overall loss function Loss includes the content preservation lossfunction L_(cp) and the style transfer loss function L_(ts).

In embodiments, the encoder-decoder model is trained using the styletransfer loss function L_(ts) to generate target sequence data 222 thatexhibits a transfer between two different style corpora (e.g., from texthaving traits of an excitement style corpora to text having traits of aformal style corpora), or between different levels of the same style(e.g., from text having a first level of excitement style corpora totext having a second level of the excitement style corpora, where thesecond level exhibits text having a stronger excitement trait than thefirst level). The style transfer loss function L_(ts) incentivizes theencoder-decoder model to produce target sequence data 222 having thedominant trait(s) of the second style corpora, or target level of stylecorpora, when the encoder-decoder model is selecting words at each timestep based on the overall probability distribution P_(t)(w) for eachtime step t, in some embodiments. Additionally, the style transfer lossfunction L_(ts) penalizes the encoder-decoder model when it producestarget sequence data 222 that does not exhibit the dominant traits(s) ofthe second target style corpora, or target level of style corpora, invarious embodiments. In this manner, the style transfer loss functionL_(ts) creates reinforcement when the encoder-decoder model performs astyle transfer, in embodiments.

In order to create the incentivized reinforcement learning aspect of thestyle transfer framework 200, a discriminator-based loss function isimplemented to reward the encoder-decoder model to produce targetsequence data 222 having improved or increased style transfer strength,in some embodiments. Specifically, the style transfer loss functionL_(ts) may comprise a high-to-low log operation that reward and thusimproves style transfer strength, in various embodiments. In oneembodiment, the high-to-low log operation of the style transfer lossfunction L_(ts) is shown in the following example:L _(ts)=−log(1−s(y′))

In embodiments, the equation directly above is implemented by the styletransfer framework 200 to train the encoder-decoder model to transfersource sequence data 206 from a first level of a particular stylecorpora to target sequence data 222 of a second level of the particularstyle corpora, wherein the second level corresponds to a lower level, ora style of reduced strength, relative to the first level. In thisexample of the high-to-low log operation of the style transfer lossfunction L_(ts), the variable y′ represents the target sequence data 222generated by the decoder component 204. In the high-to-low log operationof the style transfer loss function L_(ts), the variable s(y′)represents a classifier score of y′, in embodiments. In accordance withthis example using a high-to-low style transfer loss function L_(ts), asthe classifier score s(y′) decreases, the style transfer loss valuedecreases. Using the high-to-low style transfer loss function L_(ts),the target sequence data 222 from the decoder component 204 exhibitsminimized style transfer loss values when the source sequence data 206is transferred from, for example, one style level to another, lesserstyle level.

Additionally or alternatively, the style transfer loss function L_(ts)may comprise a low-to-high log operation that rewards and thus improvesstyle transfer strength, in some embodiments. In an embodiment, thelow-to-high style transfer loss function L_(ts) is shown in thefollowing example:L _(ts)=−log(s(y′))

In embodiments, the equation directly above is implemented by the styletransfer framework 200 to train the encoder-decoder model when thesource sequence data 206 is being transferred from a first level of aparticular style corpora to a second level of the particular stylecorpora, wherein the second level corresponds to a higher level or astyle of greater strength relative to the first level.

The style transfer loss function L_(ts), which may comprise thehigh-to-low log operation and/or the low-to-high log operation, isintegrated into the overall loss function Loss that is used to train theencoder-decoder model of the style transfer framework 200, in anembodiment. Reducing style transfer loss L_(ts) is desirable because alower style transfer loss value indicates that there is an increased orhigher probability of transferring the source sequence data 206 from thefirst style (e.g., source style corpora) to the target sequence data 222having the second style (e.g., target style corpora), in someembodiments. In this manner, the style transfer loss function L_(ts)operates to reward reduction and/or minimization loss, thus theencoder-decoder model is trained to reduce and/or minimize the styletransfer loss value produced by the style transfer loss function L_(ts).Further, the encoder-decoder model produces target sequence data 222that has improved probabilities of having the dominant trains of thetarget style corpora or target level of style, in various embodiments.The reinforcement of the style transfer loss function improves the styletransfer strength of the style transfer framework 200 itself, generally.

In various embodiments, the decoder component 204 of the encoder-decodermodel may select a word for inclusion in the target sequence data 222based on the style transfer loss value (i.e., calculated using the styletransfer loss function L_(ts)) calculated for the word being less than astyle transfer loss value (i.e., calculated using the style transferloss function L_(ts)) calculated for all of the other words for thatparticular time step. In another embodiment, the decoder component 204may select the word based on the style transfer loss value of that wordbeing less than the style transfer loss values determined for apredefined portion of the other words for that same time step. In yetanother embodiment, the decoder component 204 may select the word basedon the style transfer loss value of that word being less than the styletransfer loss values determined for a predefined threshold (e.g., apercentage, a mode, a median) of the other words for that same timestep. In this way, the decoder component 204 of the encoder-decodermodel, either being trained or having been previously trained, selects aword at each time step in a manner that produces a particular stylisticexpression for the target sequence data 222 being assembled or otherwisegenerated by the decoder component 204, by selecting a word havingreduced and/or minimized loss values based on the style transfer lossfunction L_(ts).

In one example, when the source sequence data 206 is being transferredfrom a first style level of a style corpora to a second style level(e.g., low excitement) of that style corpora that is less than the firststyle level (e.g., highest excitement), a word having a calculated styletransfer loss value that is less than at least one other available wordfor the time step is determined by using the style transfer lossfunction expressed as L_(ts)=−log(1−s(y′)). As such, this log operatordefining the style transfer loss function may be used for transferringstyle “downward” in style level or style corpora. In another example,when the source sequence data 206 is being transferred from a firststyle level of a style corpora to a second style level (e.g., highestexcitement, level 5) that is greater than the first style level (e.g.,moderate excitement, level 3) of that style corpora, a word having thestyle transfer loss value that is less than at least one other availableword for the time step is determined by using the style transfer lossfunction expressed as L_(ts)=−log(s(y′)). In this example, this logoperator defining the style transfer loss function may be used fortransferring style “upward” in level of a style corpora.

In some embodiments where the loss function L_(ts) is paired with thecross entropy loss function L_(ml), the combination of these lossfunctions into the overall loss function Loss used to train theencoder-decoder model to reduce and/or minimize loss produces improvedcontent preservation and creates a robust style transfer between stylecorpora in the target sequence data 222 that is produced.

In evaluating the style transfer strength of the target sequence data 22produced by the encoder-decoder model, the transfer style strength maybe measured as a percentage of sentences (e.g., a percentage accuracy),generated by the decoder component 204, that belong to the target stylecorpora relative to an average of previously determined classificationprobabilities for target sequence data 222 that was generated using apre-trained style classifier (e.g., an average score). The pre-trainedstyle classifier may be a convolutional neural network based classifier,in some embodiments. For example, the pre-trained style classifier maydetermine and output probabilities that the source sequence data 206belongs to a particular style corpora. In such an example, thesepreviously determined classification probabilities are used as a proxyto the incentive or reward values in the style transfer framework 200during training.

However, because probabilities may not be compatible with, or may not beuseable as reward values in some methods of training (e.g., Self-CriticSequence Training), the log functions of the style transfer lossfunction L_(ts) may be implemented to transform previously determinedclassification probabilities into compatible reward values, inembodiments. For example, in one embodiment, by appending the logfunctions of style transfer loss function L_(ts) to the cross entropyloss function L_(ml), the previously determined classificationprobabilities input to the log functions are transformed into rewardvalues that are useable in frameworks such as Self-Critic SequenceTraining that otherwise would not be compatible with probabilities ofthe style transfer loss function L_(ts). As such, in some embodiments,the style transfer loss function L_(ts) transforms the style transferstrength probabilities into reward values that are compatible with thereward values of the content preservation loss function L_(cp), forexample, such as BLEU scores. Also, by directly appending the logfunctions of the style transfer loss function L_(ts) to the crossentropy loss function L_(ml), embodiments herein are able to evaluatethe performance of the encoder-decoder model on a word-by-word basis(e.g., word level of granularity), as opposed to a sentence-levelevaluation. Thus, these embodiments provide a direct optimization of theencoder-decoder model at a deeper granularity than found in othermachine-learning technologies.

As discussed, by implementing the style transfer loss function L_(ts) totrain the encoder-decoder model in the style transfer framework 200, theperformance of the encoder-decoder model itself is improved in thepractical application of machine translation of sequence data from onecorpora to another. Furthermore, by applying or implementing the styletransfer loss function L_(ts), the encoder-decoder model gains a new andunconventional function of stylistic expression transfer.

Although specific embodiments of the overall loss function Loss arediscussed hereinabove, it is contemplated that various embodiments ofthe overall loss function Loss are within the scope of this disclosure.In one embodiment, the overall loss function Loss may be alternativelyexpressed as Loss=αL_(ml)+βL_(cp). In another embodiment, the overallLoss function may be alternatively expressed as Loss=αL_(ml)+γL_(ts).

Additionally, it is contemplated that the overall loss function Loss mayemploy any combination of the discussed loss functions, includingαL_(ml), βL_(cp), and/or γL_(ts). Moreover, it is contemplated that anycombination of αL_(ml), βL_(cp), and/or γL_(ts) may be used to train andhone the performance of the encoder-decoder model. For example, one ormore initial epochs of training of the model may utilize only the crossentropy loss function αL_(ml), while one or more subsequent epochs mayutilize the cross entropy loss function αL_(ml) in combination with thecontent preservation loss function βL_(cp) and/or the style transferloss function γL_(ts). As such, all variants of the overall lossfunction and all combinations of training using combinations of the lossfunctions is/are contemplated to be within the scope of this disclosure.

Exemplary Flow Diagrams

Moving on, FIG. 4 illustrates a method 400 for implementing stylisticexpression transfer between corpora in accordance with an embodiment ofthe present invention. In embodiments, the method 400 may be acomputer-implemented method that is performed by at least one processor.Accordingly, the method 400 may be performed via a computing device, inembodiments.

The computing device may include an encoder component, such as theencoder component 202 of FIGS. 2 and 3, which may receive sourcesequence data. As shown in FIG. 4, at block 402, the encoder componentmay receive source sequence data, the source sequence data including asource sentence of one or more words, in accordance with the method 400.

The computing device may include a time step mapping component, such asthe time step mapping component 210 of FIG. 3, which may encode thesource sequence data as one or more time steps. At block 404 of themethod 400 of FIG. 4, the time step mapping component may encode thesource sequence data as one or more time steps, the one or more timesteps corresponding to the one or more words of the source sentence. Infurther embodiments, the computing device may include a hidden stateencoding component, such as the hidden state encoding component 214 ofFIG. 3. In one embodiment, the hidden state encoding component may mapall hidden states for a time step into a latent space. Additionally oralternatively, the computing device may include an attention component,such as the attention component 218 of FIG. 2, which may determineattention weights for each of the one or more hidden states. In someembodiments, the attention component of the computing device performingthe method 400 determines attention weights for each of the one or morehidden states. For example, each of the hidden states for each time stepmay be weighted using attention weights in order to compute theattention context vector.

Continuing, the computing device may include a decoder component, suchas decoder component 204 of FIGS. 2 and 3. At block 406, the decodercomponent may, for each of the one or more time steps, decode the timestep by determining a word having a content preservation loss value thatis less than at least one other word for the time step and having astyle transfer loss value that is less than the at least one other wordfor the time step.

In some embodiments, the word having a content preservation loss valuethat is less than the at least one other word for the time step iscalculated using a content preservation loss function. In oneembodiment, the content preservation loss function L_(cp) may beexpressed as L_(cp)=(r(y′)−r(y^(s)))Σ_(t=1) ^(m) log p(y_(t) ^(s)|y₁^(s) . . . y_(t−1) ^(s),x).

In some embodiments, the word having the style transfer loss value thatis less than the at least one other word for the time step is calculatedusing a style transfer loss function. In one embodiment, the styletransfer loss function may be expressed as L_(ts)=−log(1−s(y′)).Additionally or alternatively, the word having the style transfer lossvalue that is less than the at least one other word for the time step iscalculated using a style transfer loss function, wherein the styletransfer loss function is expressed as, in an embodiment,L_(ts)=−log(s(y′)).

In various embodiments, the decoder component may select the word basedon the style transfer loss value being less than a style transfer lossvalue of all of the other words for the time step. In anotherembodiment, the decoder component may select the word based on the styletransfer loss value being less than the style transfer loss valuesdetermined for a predefined portion of the other words for the timestep. In yet another embodiment, the decoder component may select theword based on the style transfer loss value being less than the styletransfer loss values determined for a predefined threshold (e.g., apercentage, a mode, a median) of the other words for the time step.

In some embodiments, the decoder component may further determine a crossentropy value for a word. For example, a word having the cross entropyloss value that is less than the at least one other word for the timestep is calculated using a cross entropy loss function. In oneembodiment, the cross entropy loss function may be expressed asL_(ml)=−Σ_(t=1) ^(m) log p(P_(t)(y_(t)*).

In some embodiments, decoding the time step comprises applying anoverall loss function at the time step. In one embodiment, the overallloss function may be expressed as Loss=αL_(ml)+γL_(ts). In anotherembodiment, the overall loss function may be expressed asLoss=αL_(ml)+βL_(cp). In yet another embodiment, the overall lossfunction may be expressed as Loss=αL_(ml)+βL_(cp)+γL_(ts).

In various embodiments, decoding the time step comprises determining avocabulary probability distribution. Additionally or alternatively,decoding the time step comprises determining a words probabilitydistribution, in some embodiments. In some embodiments, the decodercomponent of the computing device comprises one or more of a recurrentneural network component or pointer network component, as describedherein. In such embodiments, the decoder component may predict avocabulary probability distribution using the recurrent neural networkcomponent of the computing device performing the method 400.Additionally or alternatively, the decoder component may predict a wordsprobability distribution using the pointer network component of thecomputing device performing the method 400.

Continuing with the method, at block 408, the decoder component may, foreach of the one or more time steps, select the word based on thedecoding. In various embodiments, the number of words selected may bemore or less than the number of time steps. For example, a phrase orn-gram may be selected for one time step. In some embodiments, the wordselected based on the decoding is the word that has a highest overallprobability distribution relative to the other words at the time step.At block 410, the decoder component may generate target sequence data,the electronic target sequence data including a target sentence thatincludes the word selected for the one or more time steps based on thedecoding, wherein the target sequence data is different from the sourcesequence data.

In embodiments, the target sequence data produced by the decodercomponent (e.g., that encodes a target sentence for output) exhibits thedesired stylistic expression transfer, while preserving the content ofthe source sequence data, based on the decoder component's decoding ofeach of the time steps, by determining a word having a contentpreservation loss value that is less than at least one other word forthe time step and having a style transfer loss value that is less thanat least one other word for the time step. The stylistic expressiontransfer is achieved by careful word selection based on contentpreservation loss values and style transfer loss values for each timestep. For example, as discussed, the loss function L_(ts) incentivizesthe encoder-decoder model to produce sentences with trait(s) of thesecond “target” style, or target level of style, when theencoder-decoder model is selecting words at each time step t based onthe overall probability distribution P_(t)(w) for each time step t, insome embodiments. Additionally, the loss function L_(ts) penalizes theencoder-decoder model when it produces target sequence data withtraits(s) that do not belong to the second target style, or target levelof style, in various embodiments. In this manner, the target sequencedata produced by the decoder component exhibits the desired stylisticexpression transfer, while preserving the content of the source sequencedata, based on the decoder component's decoding of each of the timesteps, by determining a word having a content preservation loss valuethat is less than at least one other word for the time step and having astyle transfer loss value that is less than at least one other word forthe time step.

Turning now to FIG. 5, a method 500 for implementing stylisticexpression transfer in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention is illustrated. In embodiments, the method 500 may be acomputer-implemented method, performed by at least one processor. Forexample, in an embodiment, one or more (e.g., non-transitory storage)computer-readable media having computer instructions stored thereon forexecution by one or more processors may be used to perform the method500, wherein execution of the computer instructions by the one or moreprocessors results in performance of the method 500. Accordingly, themethod 500 may be performed via a computing device, in embodiments. Thecomputing device may include one or more of an encoder component havinga time step mapping component and/or a hidden state encoding component,a decoder component having a recurrent neural network component and/or apointer network component, and/or an attention component, for example,such as components of the same name shown in FIGS. 2 and 3.

Beginning at block 502 of the method 500, the encoder component mayreceive source sequence data, the source sequence data including asource sentence of one or more words, in accordance with the method 500.The encoder component may then encode the electronic source sequencedata as one or more time steps, the one or more time steps correspondingto the one or more words of the sentence, as shown as block 504. Theencoder component may generate a compressed representation of thesequence source data by embedding the sequence source data, as depictedat block 506.

For each of the one or more time steps in the compressed representation,the decoder component may decode the time step by determining lossvalues for one or more words available for selection, as shown at block508. In embodiments, decoding comprises calculating a contentpreservation loss value for at least one of the one or more wordsavailable for selection is less than at least one other word for thetime step, at block 510. Decoding may further comprise calculating astyle transfer loss value for the at least one of the one or more wordsavailable for selection that is less than the at least one other wordfor the time step, shown at block 512.

As discussed herein, loss function values may be calculated for one ormore available words at each time step, and those loss functions drivecontent preservation and style transfer. In embodiments, the decodercomponent determines that one word has a lowest content preservationloss value relative to other words for the time step based on a contentpreservation loss function, as discussed herein. Additionally, in onesuch embodiment, the decoder component determines whether the one wordalso has a lowest style transfer loss value relative to the other wordsfor the time step, based on a style transfer loss function, as discussedherein. In a further embodiment, the decoder component may determinewhether the one word also has a reduced or lowest cross entropy lossvalue relative to the other words for the time step, based on a crossentropy loss function, as discussed herein.

At block 514, for each of the one or more time steps, the decodercomponent may select the at least one word based on the contentpreservation loss value and the style transfer loss value calculated forthe at least one word being is less than a content preservation lossvalue and a style transfer loss value calculated for at least one otherword for the time step. Then, at block 516, the decoder component maygenerate target sequence data, the target sequence data including atarget sentence that includes the at least one word selected for the oneor more time steps, wherein the target sequence data is different fromthe source sequence data. In embodiments, the target sequence dataproduced via the method 500 exhibits the desired stylistic expressiontransfer, while preserving the content of the source sequence data,based on the decoder component's decoding of each of the time steps, asdiscussed with regard to loss function values.

It is contemplated that the systems and methods discussed herein may beused in a variety of implementations, such that the systems and methodsare not limited to those practical applications of the technologydiscussed herein. As such, the systems and methods discussed herein maybe deployed in practical applications for machine-translation stylisticexpression transfer in mediums other than text. The systems and methodsherein may be implemented, for example, and without limitation, withregard to automatic speech recognition or generation, image recognition,visual art processing, natural language processing, customerrelationship management, recommendations systems, healthcare, imagerestoration, bioinformatics, and more.

Exemplary Operating Environment

Turning to FIG. 6, it depicts a block diagram of a computing device 600suitable to implement embodiments of the present invention. It will beunderstood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the computingdevice 600 is just one non-limiting example of a suitable computingdevice and is not intended to limit the scope of use or functionality ofthe present invention. Similarly, the computing device 600 should not beinterpreted as imputing any dependency and/or any requirements withregard to each component and combination(s) of components illustrated inFIG. 6. It will be appreciated by those having ordinary skill in the artthat the connections illustrated in FIG. 6 may comprise other methods,hardware, software, and/or devices for establishing a communicationslink between the components, devices, systems, and entities. Althoughthe connections are depicted using one or more solid lines, it will beunderstood by those having ordinary skill in the art that theconnections of FIG. 6 may be hardwired or wireless, and may useintermediary components that have been omitted or not included in FIG. 6for simplicity's sake. As such, the absence of components from FIG. 6should be not be interpreted as limiting the present invention toexclude additional components and combination(s) of components.Moreover, though devices and components are represented in FIG. 6 assingular devices and components, it will be appreciated that someembodiments may include a plurality of the devices and components suchthat FIG. 6 should not be considered as limiting the number of a devicesor components.

Continuing, the computing device 600 may be in the form of a server, insome embodiments. Although illustrated as one component in FIG. 6, thepresent invention may utilize a plurality of local servers and/or remoteservers in the computing device 600. The computing device 600 mayinclude components such as a processing unit, internal system memory,and a suitable system bus for coupling to various components, includinga database or database cluster. The system bus may be any of severaltypes of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, aperipheral bus, and a local bus, using any of a variety of busarchitectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architecturesinclude Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro ChannelArchitecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video ElectronicStandards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral ComponentInterconnect (PCI) bus, also known as Mezzanine bus.

The computing device 600 may include or may have access to one or morecomputer-readable media. Computer-readable media may be any availablemedia that may be accessed by the computing device 600.Computer-readable media may include one or more of volatile media,nonvolatile media, removable media, or non-removable media. By way of anon-limiting example, computer-readable media may include computerstorage media and/or communication media. Non-limiting examples ofcomputer storage media may include one or more of volatile media,nonvolatile media, removable media, or non-removable media, and may beimplemented in any method and/or any technology for storage ofinformation, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures,program modules, or other data. In this regard, non-limiting examples ofcomputer storage media may include Random Access Memory (RAM), Read-OnlyMemory (ROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory(EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digitalversatile disks (DVDs) or other optical disk storage, magneticcassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage, or other magneticstorage device, or any other medium which may be used to storeinformation and which may be accessed by the computing device 600.Generally, the computer storage media is non-transitory such that itdoes not comprise a signal per se.

Communication media may embody computer-readable instructions, datastructures, program modules, and/or other data in a modulated datasignal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism.Communication media may include any information delivery media. As usedherein, the term “modulated data signal” refers to a signal that has oneor more of its attributes set or changed in such a manner as to encodeinformation in the signal. Non-limiting examples of communication mediamay include wired media, such as a wired network connection, adirect-wired connection, and/or a wireless media, such as acoustic,radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media. Combinationsof any of the above also may be included within the scope ofcomputer-readable media.

Continuing with FIG. 6, a block diagram of a computing device 600suitable for providing packing instructions is provided, in accordancewith an embodiment of the technology. It should be noted that althoughsome components depicted in FIG. 6 are shown in the singular, they maybe plural, and the components may be connected in a different, includingdistributed, configuration. For example, computing device 600 mayinclude multiple processors and/or multiple radios. As shown in FIG. 6,computing device 600 includes a bus 602 that may directly or indirectlyconnect different components together, including memory 604 and aprocessor 606. In further embodiments, the computing device 600 mayinclude one or more of an input/output (I/O) port 608, I/O component610, presentation component 612, or wireless communication component614, such as a radio transceiver. The computing device 600 may becoupled to a power supply 616, in some embodiments.

Memory 604 may take the form of the memory components described herein.Thus, further elaboration will not be provided here, but it should benoted that memory 604 may include any type of tangible medium that iscapable of storing information, such as a database. A database mayinclude any collection of records, data, and/or other information. Inone embodiment, memory 604 may include a set of computer-executableinstructions that, when executed, facilitate various functions or stepsdisclosed herein. These instructions will variously be referred to as“instructions” or an “application” for short. Processor 606 may actuallybe multiple processors that may receive instructions and process themaccordingly. Presentation component 612 may include a display, aspeaker, a screen, a portable digital device, and/or other componentsthat may present information through visual (e.g., a display, a screen,a lamp, a light-emitting diode (LED), a graphical user interface (GUI),and/or even a lighted keyboard), auditory (e.g., a speaker), hapticfeedback, and/or other tactile cues. Wireless communication component614 may facilitate communication with a network as previously describedherein. Additionally or alternatively, the wireless communicationcomponent 614 may facilitate other types of wireless communications,such as Wi-Fi, WiMAX, LTE, Bluetooth, and/or other VoIP communications.In various embodiments, the wireless communication component 614 may beconfigured to concurrently support multiple technologies.

I/O port 608 may take a variety of forms. Example I/O ports may includea USB jack, a stereo jack, an infrared port, a firewire port, and/orother proprietary communications ports. I/O component 610 may compriseone or more keyboards, microphones, speakers, touchscreens, and/or anyother item useable to directly or indirectly input data into thecomputing device 600. Power supply 616 may include batteries, fuelcells, and/or any other component that may act as a power source tosupply power to computing device 600 or to other components.

Although internal components of the computing device 600 are notillustrated for simplicity, those of ordinary skill in the art willappreciate that internal components and their interconnection arepresent in the computing device 600 of FIG. 6. Accordingly, additionaldetails concerning the internal construction of the computing device 600are not further disclosed herein.

Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forthherein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which theseinventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing description and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is tobe understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specificembodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in adescriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, unlessdescribed otherwise.

What is claimed is:
 1. One or more computer-readable media havingcomputer instructions stored thereon for execution by one or moreprocessors, wherein execution of the computer instructions by the one ormore processors provides a method for stylistic expression transfer, themethod comprising: receiving source sequence data, the source sequencedata including a source sentence of one or more words; encoding thesource sequence data as one or more time steps, the one or more timesteps corresponding to the one or more words of the source sentence; foreach of the one or more time steps: decoding the time step bydetermining a word having a content preservation loss value that is lessthan at least one other word for the time step and having a styletransfer loss value that is less than the at least one other word forthe time step; and selecting the word based on the decoding; andgenerating target sequence data, the target sequence data including atarget sentence that includes the word selected for each of the one ormore time steps based on the decoding, wherein the target sequence datais different from the source sequence data.
 2. The media of claim 1,wherein decoding the time step further comprises determining avocabulary probability distribution.
 3. The media of claim 1, whereindecoding the time step further comprises determining a words probabilitydistribution, and wherein the word selected based on the decoding has ahighest overall probability distribution relative to the at least oneother word at the time step.
 4. The media of claim 1, wherein decodingthe time step further comprises determining a cross entropy loss valuefor the word, wherein the cross entropy loss value is calculated using across entropy loss function, wherein the cross entropy loss function. 5.The media of claim 1, wherein the word having the content preservationloss value that is less than the at least one other word for the timestep is calculated using a content preservation loss function.
 6. Themedia of claim 1, wherein the word having the style transfer loss valuethat is less than the at least one other word for the time step iscalculated using a style transfer loss function that transfers thesource data having a first style level to the target sequence datahaving a second style level that is less than the first style level. 7.The media of claim 1, wherein the word having the style transfer lossvalue that is less than the at least one other word for the time step iscalculated using a style transfer loss function that transfers thesource data having a first style level to the target sequence datahaving a second style level that is less than the first style level. 8.The media of claim 1, further comprises applying an overall lossfunction at the time step in order to train an encoder-decoder model. 9.The media of claim 8, wherein the overall loss function comprises afirst weight applied to a content preservation loss function and asecond weight applied to a style transfer loss function.
 10. The mediaof claim 8, wherein the overall loss function comprises a first weightapplied to a cross entropy loss function, a second weight applied to acontent preservation loss function, and a third weight applied to astyle transfer loss function.
 11. The media of claim 10, wherein thethird weight is greater than the first weight and the second weight. 12.A method for implementing stylistic expression transfer, the methodcomprising: receiving source sequence data, the source sequence dataincluding a source sentence of one or more words; encoding the sourcesequence data as one or more time steps, the one or more time stepscorresponding to the one or more words of the source sentence, whereinencoding comprises: generating a compressed representation of thesequence source data by embedding the sequence source data; for each ofthe one or more time steps in the compressed representation, decodingthe time step by determining loss values for at least one word availablefor selection, wherein decoding comprises: calculating a contentpreservation loss value for the at least one word available forselection is less than at least one other word for the time step;calculating a style transfer loss value for the at least one wordavailable for selection that is less than the at least one other wordfor the time step; for each of the one or more time steps, selecting theat least one word based on the content preservation loss value and thestyle transfer loss value calculated for the at least one word beingless than a content preservation loss value and a style transfer lossvalue calculated for the at least one other word for the time step; andgenerating target sequence data, the target sequence data including atarget sentence that includes the at least one word selected for the oneor more time steps, wherein the target sequence data is different fromthe source sequence data.
 13. The method of claim 12, further comprisingdetermining an overall loss value for the at least one word at each ofthe one or more time steps, wherein the overall loss value comprises afirst weight applied to a cross entropy loss function, a second weightapplied to a content preservation loss function, and a third weightapplied to a style transfer loss function.
 14. The method of claim 12,further comprising, for each of the one or more time steps, calculatinga words probability distribution.
 15. The method of claim 12, furthercomprising mapping each of the one or more words of the source sequencedata to an embedding space.
 16. The method of claim 12, furthercomprising mapping all of one or more hidden states for the one or moretime steps into a latent space.
 17. The method of claim 16, furthercomprising determining attention weights for each of the one or morehidden states.
 18. The method of claim 12, wherein when the sourcesequence data is being transferred from a first style level to a secondstyle level that is less than the first style level, the at least oneword having the style transfer loss value that is less than the at leastone other word for the time step is calculated using a style transferloss function.
 19. The method of claim 12, wherein when the sourcesequence data is being transferred from a first style level to a secondstyle level that is greater than the first style level, the at least oneword having the style transfer loss value that is less than the at leastone other word for the time step is calculated using a style transferloss function.
 20. A computer system comprising: one or more processors;and one or more computer-readable media having computer instructionsstored thereon for execution by the one or more processors, whereinexecution of the computer instructions by the one or more processorscause operations comprising: receiving source sequence data, the sourcesequence data including a source sentence of one or more words; encodingthe source sequence data as one or more time steps, the one or more timesteps corresponding to the one or more words of the source sentence; foreach of the one or more time steps: decoding the time step bydetermining a word having a content preservation loss value that is lessthan at least one other word for the time step and having a styletransfer loss value that is less than the at least one other word forthe time step; and selecting the word based on the decoding; andgenerating target sequence data, the target sequence data including atarget sentence that includes the word selected for the one or more timesteps based on the decoding, wherein the target sequence data isdifferent from the source sequence data.